It's that time again, time for a look back at the year that was, time to try to make sense of it all. What did 2012 tell us about the state of the news business? What are the lessons to be learned? And what should we expect in the year to come?

Here are my thoughts.

Years ago I had a student who was a real chatterbox. From the time she walked into class each morning until the moment she left, she was talking, talking, talking.

There's nothing wrong with that per se. Some of the best reporters have the kind of gregarious personalities that go hand-in-hand with chattiness.

The problem was, her articles for the student newspaper were under-reported efforts that usually couldn't be published. She wasn't a bad writer, but the information just wasn't there.

You've probably guessed the problem. Good reporters need to be - have to be - good listeners. Whether they're covering a speech, a school board meeting or doing a one-on-one interview, reporters have to listen closely to what's being said, then get what they've heard - quotes, background information and so on - into their notebooks or recorders so they can eventually put that material into their stories.

But the chatty Cathy in my class was too busy talking to ever stop and listen. The result was that her stories, instead of being a rich stew of solid reportage, were more like a thin gruel a la Dickens' Oliver Twist.

Read more...

It's something of a trend in journalism right now: Reporters who let sources decide which quotes of theirs can be used in a story.

It's a practice that's especially widespread in political coverage. On the 2012 campaign trail, both the Obama and Romney camps demand quote approval. "Politicians and their advisers are routinely demanding that reporters allow them final editing power" over quotes, Jeremy Peters of The New York Times reported.

Meanwhile, Michael Lewis, who received virtually unfettered access to President Obama for his profile in Vanity Fair, has revealed that he also had to agree to give the White House the final say on which quotes from their many interviews could be used.

Such revelations have prompted much soul-searching among news outlets. The Times has said it's reviewing its policy on quote approval. The National Journal banned the practice, and The Associated Press trumpeted the fact that it never allowed it in the first place.

Read more...

A recent New York Times article on research into caloric restriction illustrates one of the pitfalls of science reporting - namely, that scientists are just as human as the rest of us.

The article, by Gina Kolata, is about a study in which rhesus monkeys were kept for 25 years on severely restricted diets. The result? The monkeys were so thin they were roughly the equivalent of a a 6-foot-tall man who weighed around 120 pounds.

The purpose of the study was to discover whether monkeys kept on such a diet would live longer. Earlier studies on lab rats, flies and worms had indicated that severely restricted diets might indeed result in longer lives.

And as the Times article makes clear, the earlier caloric restriction studies had led scientists to hope that the study on monkeys, who are much more similar to humans, might yield similar results.

But it didn't. The semi-starved rhesus monkeys lived no longer than monkeys fed a normal diet.

What's interesting is the disappointment of the researchers involved. They wanted their study to show that semi-starvation prolonged life. They wanted it to be true because such a finding might someday lead to ways of extending human life.

Of course, scientists aren't supposed to think that way. They're supposed to be objective, dispassionate seekers of truth. They develop a theory, then subject that theory to rigorous experimentation. If the theory isn't borne out in the lab, then it's discarded.

Read more...

The games have, if only briefly, shone a light amid the gloom. Set aside for a moment the enormous success of Team USA to consider Oscar Pistorius, the South African man who ran the 400 meters on two prosthetic legs, all the way to the semifinals. Or Sarah Attar, the first woman from ultraconservative Saudi Arabia to compete in track and field at the Olympics. She ran the 800 meters covered from head to toe, and though she finished far behind her nearest competitor there were waves and waves of applause as she crossed the finish line. Progress.

But let's resist the temptation to politicize the games; they are, in the end, about the transformation that occurs in the human spirit when the human body is pushed to its ultimate limits; or, more modestly, about the joys of the physical.

Read more...

Having written earlier about Brit journo Guy Adams being knocked off Twitter (he was subsequently reinstated) after bashing NBC's coverage of the Olympics, I thought I might as well take on all the whining about the network's coverage directly, since that's exactly what it is - whining.

Let me state for the record that I don't work for NBC and so don't really have a dog in this fight one way or the other. I'm just tired of all the complaining or, since we're talking about the London Olympics, whinging.

Most of the criticisms from Adams and others center on the fact that the games are being shown on a tape-delay in the U.S. Well guess what, folks - London is five hours ahead of New York, eight hours ahead of Los Angeles. How many people would be watching if NBC broadcast the opening ceremonies, or Michael Phelps in the 200-meter butterfly for that matter, starting at noon Pacific time? NBC paid a few billion bucks to televise the Olympics, which means they have to try to make that money back through advertising. How much do you think advertisers will be willing to fork out for commercials that will air when about 11 people are watching?

Read more...

For years, many sports journalists served as an echo chamber for the adulation surrounding Penn State football coach Joe Paterno. Even after sex abuse allegations involving former assistant coach Jerry Sandusky came to light, they defended the man affectionately known as "JoePa."

Now, in the wake of former FBI director Louis Freeh's damning report on the Penn State child rape scandal, Paterno's once-vaunted legacy is forever shattered. And some sportswriters who once heaped praise on the coach are admitting they were wrong.

But the whole tragic episode raises tough questions about whether sports journalists too easily glorify the athletes and coaches they cover, and whether they're equipped to be more critical of figures who are revered by the public.

Read more...

Long before he was the CBS anchorman at the epicenter of the "memogate" maelstrom that would effectively end his career at the storied network, Dan Rather was a kid in a hardscrabble Houston neighborhood witnessing his father's obsession with newspapers, and the news.

"My father didn't just read newspapers; he devoured them," Rather writes in his new memoir, "Rather Outspoken: My Life in the News." "Much to my mother's displeasure, he stockpiled the ones he hadn't had time to get through in one sitting. He barricaded his favorite chair with them, and the piles never seemed to get smaller. In a house that was anything but spacious, his stacks of old newspapers were a problem, but they were sacrosanct. He refused to let my mother get rid of them."

Soon the young Rather, still in elementary school, was starting his own student newspaper. And when he was bedridden with rheumatic fever for long stretches of junior high, he listened religiously to Edward R. Murrow's wartime broadcasts from London. "By the time I was 13, becoming a reporter was my driving dream," he writes.

Read more...

Bad news in the Big Easy: The New Orleans Times-Picayune, that storied city's storied newspaper, has announced it will only print three days a week and that the newsroom staff is being cut.

It's sad not just for the paper, which won two Pulitzers for helping to hold New Orleans together during Hurricane Katrina, but of course for the city itself. As several columnists noted, if ever a town needed a good, strong newspaper it was the colorful and corrupt home of Bourbon Street, Mardi Gras and jazz.

The paper's owners, Advance Publications, said the changes were part of an increased emphasis on the paper's digital presence, but it's not clear to me how the Times-Picayune will beef up its website with fewer reporters. And I'm not the first to question the wisdom of emphasizing digital in one of the nation's poorest cities, where, according to one study, 36 percent of residents still don't have Internet access at home.

Read more...

When I was in grad school I had a part-time gopher job at the New York Daily News. But my dream was to be a reporter in a big-city newsroom, so one day I put together my best clips and walked into the office of one of the paper's top editors.

I'd toiled at several student papers and had an internship under my belt. I'd also worked part-time at a local daily paper when I was an undergrad. So I asked her if I had what it took to get a reporting job there. No, she said. Not yet.

"This is the big-time," she told me. "You can't afford to make mistakes here. Go and make your mistakes at a smaller paper, then come back when you're ready."

She was right.

To continue reading, please click here.