- Member Type(s): Expert
- Title:Principal and Co-founder
- Organization:InkHouse Media + Marketing
- Area of Expertise:Public relations, social media, content
To become a ProfNet premium member and receive requests from reporters looking for expert sources, click here.
Thursday, July 9, 2015, 9:24 AM
The day I decided I wanted to meet Meghna Chakrabarti, co-host of WBUR’s Radio Boston, I was driving home while we awaited the Tsarnaev verdict. Meghna was interviewing Tina Packer, author of “Women of Will,” a new book about the women in Shakespeare. Near the end of the piece, Tina was describing how Shakespeare found a way to communicate the complex range of human experience through his female characters. She said of emotion, “…Unless you can get out of linear revenge thinking, unless you can actually shift this idea of an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth, but you really can shift it and say I will not be the same as the person who perpetrated these horrors on me. And that means creative thinking and love.”
Tina paused a bit here (around 12:10 on the audio). I was sitting in my car at a red light in front of Whole Foods and all of the sudden I was paying close attention as Meghna asked, “Tina Packer, if I may say, you caught me off guard just now. You have some profound feelings about this…Why the tears?” To this Tina responded, “I was just thinking of the trial that’s going on in Boston right now and how it’s about revenge – what they did is about revenge and what we’re about to do is revenge – and how do we get out of it?”
As my own tears flowed and I moved through the light that had turned green without me noticing, I kept wondering why Meghna decided to ask Tina that all-important question that got to the heart – the complexity – of the issue on everyone’s minds even though it was disconnected from the story. I wanted to learn more about how Meghna brings out the complex emotions that transform news stories into human stories, so I asked her to meet up. And she graciously agreed. What follows is an edited version of our conversation.
InkHouse: What made you ask Tina Packer about what choked her up?
Meghna: Tina was in the studio and I could see that she was feeling something deeply emotional. She took a deep breath and looked up as she was trying to speak. And I thought, I’m going to go for it because something is happening. So I asked why the tears.
InkHouse: Yes, but not everyone is capable of leaning into something like that in the moment. How do you make yourself present enough to get to the good story?
Meghna: We try to get as many interviewees into the studio as possible.
Nothing replaces being in the same space as the person. Then it’s about focused listening. It’s about paying attention. An interview is only as good as the effort and energy that the interviewer puts into actually listening.
InkHouse: During times like this, how do you make a judgment call about when to throw out all of the prepared questions and go with the moment?
Meghna: The studio is very busy. Every host has two screens and lots of papers. On one screen I have Twitter going and on another my internal scripting system. When we’re taking phone calls there is another screen with the incoming calls. In other words, there is a lot of visual distraction, along with the production staff talking in your ear. It’s the worst possible environment for paying attention.
Of the conversations that have really mattered, I stopped looking at the other stuff. The key for the true professionals and masters in the craft is to prepare, prepare, prepare. You must organize your questions and do the background research. Then you put it in your brain and you have to find the confidence that it will be in your soul and your mind so you can put all of the paper down.
InkHouse: How do you center yourself enough to get into that place in the middle of so many distractions?
Meghna: I’m a big believer in mindfulness and walking. I get out of the office I take a coffee walk at 10 a.m. and around 2 p.m. for 10 minutes on most days. Just the physical engagement of my body moving and walking is clearing.
InkHouse: How do you find the stories you want to air?
Meghna: We have a multi-pronged mission so if something’s in the news we have to cover it, but it’s also about people, ideas and conversation. On the people front, we look for those with the unique ideas. The person might have one tiny quote in a Boston Globe story and we’ll call them and see if they have other interesting things to say. Books are also a major driver. Also with more frequency, it’s that I was somewhere and met someone and asked them to come on. You need to be part of your community.
InkHouse: How do you manage to dig through the chaos of social media?
Meghna: As technology becomes a force, it becomes the journalist’s job to think like a detective and researcher. It’s content curation: applying editorial standards to cut through the noise. The answer to these issues is still old-fashioned journalism. You get on the phone. Google does not have everything. Technology is just the tool.
InkHouse: In this so-called “attention economy,” how do you navigate the needs for clicks with the needs for quality reporting?
Meghna: We’re seeing the merging of value between two different poles. There are two types of news for us. On one hand, there is breaking news like the Supreme Court legalizing gay marriage. On the other is timeless content: that’s the Tina Packer conversation.
You have to do both. We’re seeing consumers of the media being savvy enough to switch between these two poles. They take the now when they want it and they take the timeless when they want it. It’s the vast middle ground where it’s tough.
The grab for attention from the BuzzFeeds of the world does have an impact. We’re in competition for people’s attention. First, how do we grab it and then how do we hold it? BuzzFeed does a good job at grabbing it. The gold standard will be for those who can grab it and hold it. On the grabbing part, we’ve had to rethink headlines and lead-ins in a very beneficial way. Technology is really helping us now though. Radio has always had a metrics problem and for the first time we can measure when people leave a program.
However, there are story-telling tenets that hold. Once you grab people with a BuzzFeed-like list, a great story, powerful narrative, or tough, courageous, and insightful interview will hold people. That’s always been true, and it remains true today.
InkHouse: What was the most difficult or interesting story you’ve told recently?
Meghna: I’ll give you two.
- Before the Tsanaev jury chose the death penalty we talked to a juror from the Timothy McVey trial (he was on trial for the attack that killed 168 people, including 19 children). McVey’s was the last federal jury to give the death penalty until now. We looked back at the history of how the government’s approach to terrorism trials has changed. It was difficult because I wanted him to tell us what it was like sitting on that jury. I wanted to know what questions he asked himself and what went through his mind when he considered this ultimate punishment that he had to choose on behalf of the people. The closest he came was to say that it should stay behind closed doors. He said that he’d been in Vietnam and never thought he’d see anything worse, and he had in that courtroom.
- Every conversation with a politician is hard. No matter what you do, it’s difficult to have an honest and meaningful conversation. Even politicians who are generally open and honest can suddenly find themselves held back by institutional barriers to transparency.
I could have spoken to Meghna for a few more hours, but the Supreme Court had just announced its ruling on marriage equality. We walked back toward the WBUR studio and as she turned to walk up to the business of reporting on a day that would turn into one of the most newsworthy of the year – marriage equality, Obama’s eulogy in Charleston and a manhunt for escaped convicts – one takeaway from our discussion stayed in my mind. At some point in our discussion, she stopped and said this:
“Mindfulness is the answer to every question you could ask me.”
Listen to Meghna daily at 3 p.m. on Radio Boston and online anytime.
Thursday, May 29, 2014, 4:59 PM
Mary Meeker at Kleiner Perkins issued this year’s “Internet Trends 2014” report at Re/Code’s Code conference yesterday. It’s 164 slides of fascinating information, but which things matter most to PR people? Here you go!
- The rumored tech bubble is not as big as some think. 2013 tech IPOs are still 73% below their 1999 peak. Venture financings, too, are 77% below their 2000 peak.
- Facebook leads social traffic referrals with 21%. Pinterest has 7% and Twitter has 1%.
- Buzzfeed is the top Facebook news publisher. Huffington Post, ABC News, Fox News and NBC follow.
- The BBC is the top Twitter news publisher. It is followed by The New York Times, Mashable, ABC News, CNN and Time.
- Buzzfeed’s formula works. It has 130MM+ unique visitors with 3x year over year growth. WOW!
- Apps are Replacing TV Channels. ESPN had 34MM digital users access ESPN just on smartphones/tablets. The BBC had 234MM requests for TV programs on iPlayer in February 2014. HBO counts 1,000+ hours of video content for HBO Go.
- YouTube Channels have Reach and are Growing! The music channel has 85MM subscribers, followed by gaming with 79MM, sports with 78MM, news with 35MM, etc.
- YouTube is birthing new stars. Video game commentator PewDiePi has 26MM subscribers.
- Fans, not Audiences! According to slide 114 that cites Alex Carloss from YouTube, “An audience tunes in when they’re told to, a fanbase chooses when and what to watch. An audience changes the channel when their show is over. A fanbase shares, comments, curates, creates….”
- TV viewing is losing ground. In 1950 TV sets accounted for 100% of viewing. In 2014 it accounts for 57%. DVRs account for 23%, connected TVs 10%, computers 6% and mobile devices 4%.
You can look through the full deck here.
Read more from Beth Monaghan
Follow Beth Monaghan on Twitter @bamonaghan
Thursday, April 3, 2014, 9:12 AM
It’s true. We were surprised too. Press releases are the most trusted source of company-generated news, according to a study we did in partnership with GMI Lightspeed of 1,000 Americans ages 18+.
Press releases won by a long shot – 33% of respondents trust them the most, followed by articles authored by the CEO (16%), blog posts by the CEO (4%) and advertisements (3%).
The trust factor varies by age. Younger audiences trust blog posts a bit more (11% of 18-34 vs. 0% of 55 or older) and articles by the CEO (23% of those 18-34 vs. 9% of those 55 and older) more than older audiences. They also put more trust in company-generated news overall – about 30-32% of those 18 to 34 do not trust any source of company-generated news. Older audiences are more skeptical.
What does this mean? Press releases, while less common these days for technology startups in particular, are still important PR tools (and they are required public disclosure vehicles for public companies). Over time though, they have become more marketing brochure than news vehicle and this evolution has lessened their impact. Press releases were designed to be news articles that could be printed in a newspaper, and they have veered a long way from that original purpose. For more, see our post, 9 Tips for Retooling the Press Release to its Intended Audience: The Press. We believe this important shift in tone and content will only continue.
We asked questions about lots of other topics – from Buzzfeed, to Facebook, email versus social media and preferred news outlets. You can view the full results in our ebook, Read It, Watch It, or Tweet It – How Americans Read and Share News.
Read more from Beth Monaghan
Follow Beth Monaghan on Twitter @bamonaghan
Thursday, October 10, 2013, 4:01 PM
Message clarity and simplicity are some of the most fundamental, and often overlooked, tenets of good PR. The average newspaper is written at the third grade reading level, yet innovative companies often ignore one of the easiest ways to draw attention: storytelling.
I was reminded of this importance yesterday on my drive to work by NPR’s Steve Inskeep and Richard Harris, who reported on the winners of this year’s Nobel Prize in Medicine for “Morning Edition.”
James Rothman, Randy Schekman and Thomas Sudhof shared this year’s prize for their discoveries of “machinery regulating vesicle traffic,” as NPR’s segment noted. This is not the language of the average third-grader, or the average NPR listener.
So Inskeep and Harris spent most of the piece providing real-world analogies and plain language descriptions of the discoveries to make the story accessible.
The discoveries have massive implications. Yet, without an easy-to-understand explanation of their impact, no one would know (save the Nobel Prize Committee, of course).
So how did they describe it? You can read or listen to it for yourself, but here are the basics of this very important story:
What is the discovery? Inskeep opened with this: he said that the three scientists had, “figured out how cells package up material like hormones, and how they deliver those materials to other cells. This is one of the most basic functions for living cells, and diseases can result when the machinery goes awry….”
How does it work? Inskeep provided this: “This is how cells communicate with each other. The cells transmit substances to one another. This is the phone line. This is the FedEx system.”
Why is it important? Harris made it very clear: “….this is very, very basic stuff that you need to understand if you’re going to cure diseases like diabetes or some neurological diseases or immune system dysfunctions.”
I am certain that the scientific community would laugh at this simplified explanation. However, it is instructive for communications professionals. At its heart, a successful PR program must tell a compelling story. And a company that has a transformational breakthrough is deserving of media attention. Yet, a company that cannot translate that breakthrough into everyday language will never be heard beyond its own community.
Wednesday, July 17, 2013, 9:45 AM
In between reporting on Edward Snowden, the crash of Asiana flight 214, and the Boston Marathon Bombing suspect’s appearance in court, Anthony De Rosa, the relatively new editor-in-chief for Circa, graciously answered a few questions for me about this innovative news platform he is presiding over and the future of journalism.
Circa is the mobile news app that breaks stories down to their core facts to make them easier to read and share. For more on how it works, read, “The Message and the Medium: Mobile News, Circa and Anthony De Rosa.” I wanted to find out more about how De Rosa and his team source news stories (Circa’s stories are written by aggregating credible sources into unique articles), and how he views the evolution of investigative journalism. Here’s our conversation:
Beth: How do Circa editors determine which sources to cite? I love the approach of using a string of facts and quotes to build stories and am curious about the process of mining through the chorus of voices to determine which is the most authoritative source on any given topic.
Anthony: We check multiple sources we’ve become comfortable with over a long period of time for their reliability. In some cases we may even contact primary sources (officials, the journalist who broke the story, emergency personnel, main subjects of the story) in order to confirm information. Nobody owns the facts, we track them down and verify them to create original storylines. We write original storylines that are made for mobile. Concise, fact-driven and to the point.
Note: On the Snowden story today alone, there are 22 citations alone, from a wide variety of sources including Wikileaks, CNN, the Guardian, Reuters, The Daily Beast, RT News, LaJournada and many more. See below.
Beth: What are your views on investigative journalism? How will it evolve in the new media model? Investigative news is still very much the purview of newspapers (with some notable exceptions), but even amid the Boston Marathon Bombings, The Boston Globe was the go-to source (although I was watching Anonymous constantly as well).
Anthony: I think local news organizations are essential to investigative journalism, as well as things like Pro Publica and data driven investigative journalism by people like Brian Boyer and Dan Sinker. There’s going to need to be a variety of ways to keep this alive. I think crowdfunding and grant-based funding are two options. I also think we’re still so early in the game that we haven’t really tried enough business models to throw our hands up and declare investigative journalism dead. There needs to be more experimentation in the monetization of this area. I would gladly pay a premium for this type of reporting.
Finally, when I asked De Rosa if he’d rather quote a press release or a blog post to cite an executive’s point of view, he said, “I’d prefer neither. We’re not in the business of publishing press releases.”
As we’ve seen over the past few years in particular, the open discussions enabled through digital and social media have brought it to the age of transparency and authenticity. This means that PR tactics are ever-changing. The release is not dead (stay tuned for my next post), but the ways in which companies communicate their points of view and news are changing dramatically. To stand out in the voices competing for attention and headlines, we must be trustworthy, interesting and quick.
Follow Beth Monaghan on Twitter @bamonaghan
Thursday, May 30, 2013, 8:30 AM
Does the medium shape the message? At Circa, it seems that it does, and I tend to agree. Circa, a very cool mobile news app, just hired Anthony De Rosa, the social media editor for Reuters. He is one of my most relied-upon social media news sources (you should follow him @AntDeRosa), so I was sad to hear that he was leaving Reuters, but happy to discover that he will remain in the business of the news. Fast Company’s Co.Labs has the details about his move.
At InkHouse, we’ve been thinking about how mobile will shape the news business since we had the pleasure of debuting the Fluent Mobile “mobile newspaper” back in 2009 (Fluent Mobile laid the foundation for what is today’s wildly successful Fiksu, a mobile app marketing platform).
Circa is taking a unique approach to mobile news by making a story available in one place, but broken down to its core components and facts to make it easier to read and share – more mobile. According to its home page Circa offers, “News without the fluff, filler, or commentary: Circa’s editors gather top stories and break them down to their essential points — facts, quotes, photos, and more, formatted specifically for the phone.”
I also like Circa’s approach to citations. The nature of the news is changing with many more inputs than ever before. Crowdsourcing is not the right word, but there are certainly many more voices of various influence involved in the making of today’s news. Circa compared this evolution to that from the encyclopedia to Wikipedia and quoted David Weinberger who said that, “transparency is the new objectivity.” Circa’s editorial policy echoes this evolution: “Every fact, quote, statistic, image or event in every story gets a citation.”
The Circa model is somewhat of a mirror for how PR has evolved to adjust to social inputs to news, and now how it’s evolving to mobile formats. What does this approach mean for PR? The changes are already underway.
At a time when PR is involved in so much content creation, transparency and citations are critical. They confer credibility to the content, and make it more social. Circa editors cite all sorts of documents, not just news releases. This too has become an important change in PR as we think far beyond the press release. Circa notes that its editors cite “news articles, Tweets (especially for quotes), scanned documents or reports, primary source legislative documents, first-person blog posts and more. We don’t believe everything we read online.”
What good PR people already know is this: PR content must be authentic, transparent, sharp and short. It must engage quickly and be easy to link to, cite and share. I am excited to see what happens with Circa. If you want to check it out you can download it for iPhone here.
Side note: If you want to read more about the medium shaping the message, check out Christopher Mims’ piece about the new blogging platform, Ghost, for Quartz. Ghost is also founded upon the premise that the medium shapes the content. Mims wrote that Ghost founder John O’Nolan’s goal is “to change how writers think, by changing the basic nature of how they write for the web.” According to the Quartz piece, the goal of Ghost will “create a system that makes it easy for writers to express thoughts without interrupting themselves to construct the elaborate, multi-media layouts that characterize articles on the web.” I’ll be watching closely!
Read more from Beth Monaghan
Follow Beth Monaghan on Twitter @bamonaghan
Wednesday, April 10, 2013, 3:54 PM
Has InkHouse succeeded because we’re lucky or because we’re smart and we work hard? According to Facebook COO and Lean In author Sheryl Sandberg, while men tend to take credit for a company’s success, women often ascribe success to “luck, help from others, and working hard.”
Sandberg has started a national discussion that has gone from the Silicon Valley, to Oprah, to The Daily Show and last Friday, to Boston at a breakfast hosted by the New England Venture Capital Association at the Harvard Club (if you missed it, you can watch the livestream video).
One of Sandberg’s tenets is the importance of fostering confidence in women. This week, Andrew Ross Sorkin interviewed Irene Dorner, president and CEO of HSBC USA in The New York Times. She said the problem of the glass ceiling is matched by the “sticky floor” (women who don’t proactively seek higher-level positions).
How can we build this confidence? Sandberg reminded us that we should feel free to make our own rules, since the old ones aren’t working that well. Women need to mentor other women. It’s an easy slide into the “I did it the hard way and so should you” mentality, which discourages young women who need mentors more than critics. Don’t be a queen bee (a woman who achieved success in male-dominated environments and tends to oppose the rise of other women). Sandberg said, “A great boss gives credit to everyone else when things are going well and when they are not, says how can I fix it?”
Following are a few of my favorite pieces of advice for women from this broader discussion:
- Balance. Sandberg said, “Families with more balance are happier.” Anyone who’s interviewed at InkHouse has heard us talk about the importance of balance – it is a foundational element of our culture. You have to show up for work and your personal life with equal passion if you want to be good at either one. Of course, balance is not something that is attainable every single day or week. A culture that strives toward balance is also one that fosters teamwork and wards off resentment when deadlines bring late nights.
- Process is not progress. Irene Dorner said, “Women do funny things. They do things like work very hard and expect to be noticed for it — and they’re not, because it doesn’t work like that.” Knowing the difference between hard work and smart work is elemental to success. At InkHouse, our clients don’t give us credit for working hard. We get credit for getting great results. It’s up to us to shine a light on those great results. No one is going to do it for us.
- Done is better than perfect. In InkHouse words, you need to know when good enough is good enough.
- Sit at the table. Not in the back of the room or at the side of the table. When preparing for important meetings, we tell employees that you only get one chance to make a first impression. Walk into the room, look the person in the eye, shake his or her hand confidently, and behave as though you belong at that table.
Sandberg’s Lean In foundation is doing amazing things to support women and to move this from discussion to action. Last year I was thrilled to see Liza Mundy’s piece in Time Magazine about the progress women have made. Nearly four in 10 working wives out-earn their husbands (up 50 percent from 20 years ago). More needs to be done, and as with all change, it starts with small steps. Sandberg suggested that each person begin by simply inviting a woman to the table, today.
A big thank you to C.A. Webb at the NEVCA for organizing this amazing event. She leans in to every single thing she does, and this event would not have been possible without her grace and energy.
Monday, April 8, 2013, 4:00 PM
According to The Pew State of News Media 2013 Report, there was a 3.6 to 1 ratio of PR people to journalists in 2008 (up from 1.2 to 1 in 1980). I am not surprised. InkHouse grew 45 percent last year, and we’re on course to do the same or more in 2013. Why this growing gap? In short, the news media’s business model is in painful flux. As the Pew notes, “newsroom cutbacks in 2012 put the industry down 30 percent since its peak in 2000 and below 40,000 full-time professional employees for the first time since 1978.”
The opportunity for PR is growing as we see new ways to engage with audiences directly and plentiful opportunities for content. Is the news business going away? Absolutely not. It’s changing.
The Content Opportunity
From our Content Bureau (read how to use content for PR in my piece for PRWeek), it is clear that thoughtful content designed to spark conversations drives engagement and often action. The content inflection point is here.
On one side, media outlets are looking to provide their content expertise to marketers. As the Pew notes, Fortune’s TOC (Trusted Original Content) program pairs Fortune writers with brands to create original content for exclusive use by marketers.
On the other side of that coin, more outlets are experimenting with contributed content from external sources. Business Insider was one of the first to introduce this model with its Business Insider Contributors (Huffington Post, as well, was an early entrant and has a host of contributors). Today, Forbes has a full roster of contributors and The Atlantic’s Quartz offers a unique approach for digital content that is organized around its stated current “obsessions.” Lauren Brown who headed up contributed articles for Business Insider is the deputy ideas editor for Quartz. And of course, many many many other high profile blogs consider guest posts that meet their editorial standards and focus, including GigaOm, TechCrunch, AllThingsD, etc.
New models of content curation and syndication are bubbling up to proliferate content beyond the boundaries of its original home. PandoDaily took the bold step of making its content freely available for reuse (through a tool called repost.us). As we recommend for infographics, the repost feature uses an embed code that likely gives PandoDaily credit for the Web traffic anywhere those articles land (it also looks like the ads get embedded with the article).
Then there are newer media models such as Buzzfeed, which I started following regularly after its “26 Moments That Restored Our Faith In Humanity This Year.” Read it. You won’t regret it. Mathew Ingram of GigaOm wrote that, “Newer digital-native publishers such as BuzzFeed are pinning their revenue hopes to sponsored content and other forms of ‘native’ advertising, in which the site creates content that is indistinguishable from its regular content.”
Don’t forget your press release, the original PR content. Releases are great for SEO, but given that “reporting resources” are “cut to the bone” with “fewer specialized beats,” (according to Pew) your press release has never been more important. Often, it provides language we see verbatim in news stories.
The Social Opportunity
The Pew report confirmed what good PR people already know — if you have great content, to make it take off, you need to get the press to pay attention and get it into your audience’s social streams. According to the Pew:
- 72% of U.S. adults most commonly get their news from friends and family (in person or by phone). Of those, 63% somewhat or very often seek out a news story about that event or issue.
- 15% of U.S. adults get most of their news from friends and family through social media. 77% of those follow links to full news stories.
- Almost 25% of those between 18 and 29 rely on social media as their primary source of news.
Like the rest of the world, we at InkHouse are interested to see which news media model will ultimately win. I think (and hope) the tide will shift back to thoughtful reporting and I applaud some of the media outlets with which InkHouse works regularly for their part in driving important conversations, including Xconomy, PandoDaily and GigaOm, which have made their brands through thorough and thoughtful reporting and analysis.
People have not lost interest in thoughtful news, they just need to be able to find it easily and understand its importance quickly. This is the job of PR.
Follow Beth Monaghan on Twitter @bamonaghan
Friday, March 15, 2013, 9:40 AM
The only industry changing more quickly than PR is the media, and we are inextricably intertwined. I entered PR in 1997. The dot.com bubble was fat, as we ignored our collective common sense in the wake of skyrocketing IPOs and lovable sock puppets, which turned out of course, to be unprofitable. Despite the dot.com buzz, we were still perfecting how to use email for media relations and favored hard copy press kits (I frequently made the midnight run to Logan Airport to make the last FedEx pickup).
Almost a decade later, InkHouse was in its formative stage, and blogging was exploding. Media empires were waning, and PR people were trying to figure out how to communicate with opinionated bloggers who operated under unknown deadlines. As it turns out, this was a boon to creative and ambitious PR people – if you were willing to exchange emails late at night, you could often get a lot more coverage than was possible just a few years earlier.
The transition was not all rainbows and unicorns though. Some bloggers waged war on PR people. Michael Arrington at TechCrunch famously decried, “Death to the Embargo,” and a number of other bloggers followed suit, but it worked best for TechCrunch. After seeing huge traffic and user spikes following a TechCrunch story, startups across the country vied for TechCrunch exclusives and sacrificed broader coverage. For a little while, we thought embargoes would go away entirely (see my post, “The Embargo Lives, for Now,” from 2011) but they are back, for the most part.
In the midst of all of this, social media, the darling of the blogsphere, changed everything again. Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn, in particular, have ushered PR into the era of authentic discourse. Press materials have turned into social content and briefings into conversations. It’s not about scripting the dialogue (although we do scrutinize our press releases much more closely since they are often reprinted verbatim!), but about participating in the conversation.
Where do we go from here? Mary Meeker’s most recent iteration of her “Internet Trends Year-End Report” showed that mobile traffic has grown to account for 13 percent of Web traffic. As Meeker’s “re-imagining of everything” has pointed out, the only certainty is change, and mobile will play a starring role.
Beyond the mechanics of how we communicate with audiences, the heart of good PR has been, and will be the same. We must offer unique and relevant viewpoints that are rooted in authority. Relationships matter and are fueled by our credibility and our authenticity. Getting there first only matters if we’re prepared. Finally, and most importantly, our jobs are ultimately to tell great stories.
Below is an infographic we created to show how things have changed, and what will always remain:
Follow me on Twitter @bamonaghan
Tuesday, January 29, 2013, 12:10 PM
Last week, I wrote about What You Should Expect from Your PR Agency. In short, you should expect a lot. Public relations is a relationship business. Great client relationships almost always translate into greater success for the overall PR program. But success is a two-way street. If you have a good PR firm that holds up its end of the bargain as I described last week, following are some things you can do to maximize success:
- Arm us with information. Give us everything you have. We want to understand your company goals, your PR goals, what makes you different, and what you think. We even want to know if you spend your weekends skydiving in New Hampshire or playing the drums in a cover band. We are experts at digging through information to find the big ideas and small details, that when combined, will compel the press to write.
- Make us the first to know. The earlier you can bring us into a major news event, the better our chances of success. Even if we can’t do advance outreach, when we have the opportunity to determine the best strategy, prepare our media lists and prioritize our targets, we’re dramatically more successful. Unfortunately, if the release has already crossed the wire, it can be too late to interest the press.
- Be responsive. If you see a high priority email with “Immediate NYT opportunity” in the subject line and notice a few missed calls from us, time is of the essence. Reporters’ deadlines can be minutes away, and we are at their mercy. The first to respond is the first to be quoted.
- Celebrate wins enthusiastically. We are accustomed to accepting no news for good news. You don’t owe us gifts or praise, and we are grateful for your business. However, if you want to be the account that everyone begs to work on, celebrate our wins enthusiastically. At InkHouse, we still talk about a client who stopped by in-person and unannounced to deliver champagne after a big launch. The team was stunned, and a year later, we still talk about it.
- Know when to blame, and when to commiserate. Your PR firm is at the mercy of reporters, and reporters are at the mercy of editors. Space sometimes shrinks at the last minute and editors are forced to cut stories. We, too, are frustrated when this happens, but it does not help us to blame the reporter. PR deals in earned media, which brings no guarantees. Join us in commiseration with the reporter, and chances are good that we’ll get into the next piece.
- Respect our media relationships. You hire us, in part, because of our media relationships. We treat reporters as if they were clients to maintain those good relationships: we don’t bring them stories we know they won’t write, and we don’t ask for corrections unless the errors are material. The upside of this is that they will listen when we bring them a good story, and they’ll make the corrections when it matters. If you can take our guidance about how and when to approach reporters, you’ll get better and more plentiful coverage in the long run.
- Calibrate your expectations. Some clients want product profiles in The Wall Street Journal, others want an Op-Ed in The New York Times. Before you fire us for telling you that this is going to be very, very hard, take a quick look through the publication of your desire. For example, by the most recent account, the Times receives 1,200 unsolicited submissions every week. A brief tour of the Op-Ed section of the Times will reveal that they print only a handful each day – the odds of acceptance are less than one percent at best (unless you are a well-known thought leader). There is almost always a path to great coverage. It just might not be the exact one you had envisioned.
- Try it our way. If you find yourself reworking our angles, and editing our copy, and are then disappointed with the results, try it our way one time. The media landscape is changing very quickly, and so must the pitches and materials we employ. In other words, we might need to remove some of your marketing language to get more traction with the media.
The eight tips above are examples of the most important element in a successful client relationship: partnership. We have the most successful relationships with clients who treat us like a partner, not a vendor. We want to be in it with you.
Follow Beth Monaghan on Twitter @bamonaghan